![]() Ideally, for a suitable unification consensus on the ways to classify forms into heteronyms should be reached. This kind of inter-dictionary variation also exists between WBD and WLD. The problem is that the heteronym classification is based on a number of different linguistic criteria and that it is up to the intuition of the editor what criteria prevail (Van Keymeulen, 2004). ![]() However the form voerkuil has been classified under the heteronym “voederkuil” in WBD while the very similar form vo e rku l has been classified under a separate heteronym “voerkuil” in WVD. 3 with the following partial entry from WVD: Both entries show the variation for the sense greenfodder pit. The biggest problem with unifying the linguistically motivated heteronym classifications used in WBD, WLD and WVD can be illustrated by comparing the partial WBD entry in Fig. ![]() are a couple of typical problems when trying to unify them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |